Licensing - Revision history

Sardisson: /* Possible Issues */ split out logo, since it has its own bug

2007-03-16T03:22:33Z

Possible Issues: split out logo, since it has its own bug

Sardisson: /* Issues */ update with new bugs

2007-02-15T07:25:14Z

Issues: update with new bugs

Sardisson: /* Possible Issues */ logo bug

2007-02-15T07:19:44Z

Possible Issues: logo bug

Sardisson: /* Possible Issues */ bug for l10n eula

2007-02-15T07:17:55Z

Possible Issues: bug for l10n eula

Admin: /* Issues */

2007-02-15T05:49:21Z

Issues

Sardisson: /* Possible Issues */ about:license "link"

2006-11-13T18:03:07Z

Possible Issues: about:license "link"

Sardisson: /* Issues */ bugs!

2006-11-13T17:58:52Z

Issues: bugs!

Sardisson: /* Possible Issues */ image licensing

2006-11-13T17:52:22Z

Possible Issues: image licensing

Marcello: /* Possible Issues */

2006-09-25T21:48:22Z

Possible Issues

Sardisson: /* Possible Issues */ there's a bug here now

2006-09-23T20:21:34Z

Possible Issues: there's a bug here now

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 ===Possible Issues===
 * License status of the application ("toolbar" et al.) images is unclear (rf. [http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=298488 debate in the mZ forum] a year or so ago)
-*:* The Camino logo is not listed among the logos that are trademarks of the Mozilla Foundation on http://www.mozilla.org/foundation/trademarks/faq.html but [http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?p=1637614#1637614 this post in the mZ forum implies] it is a trademark
+** The status and "usage rights" for these images needs to be clarified and posted on the cb.o website somewhere.
-** The status and "usage rights" for these images needs to be clarified and posted on the cb.o website somewhere.  If the logo is a Mozilla Foundation trademark, the above-referenced mozilla.org web page should be modified to include that, too.
+** If the Camino application images are not tri-licensed, [http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?p=1637861#1637861 there should be an appropriate readme file] associated with them in cvs and in the application binary.
 *** This is already done for non-tri-licensed files in certain mozilla/ directories [http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/license-policy.html]
 *: {{bug|360573}} filed on this general issue
 * .nib and .strings files have no license blocks
 ** "Trivial, empty, very short or auto-generated files may be left without a license." [http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/relicensing-faq.html]

@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 *:<s>Official '''binaries''' of this product released by the [http://www.mozilla.com/ Mozilla Corporation]  are made available under [http://www.mozilla.org/foundation/EULA/ the corresponding EULA].</s>
 ** <s>Note that EULA page/link redirects to the [http://www.mozilla.com/legal/eula/ Mozilla Corporation EULA] page, which, correctly, has no Camino EULA.</s>
-*: <s>The about:license issue is filed as {{bug|353917}}.</s>
+*: <s>The about:license issue is filed as {{bug|353917}}.</s> '''FIXED'''
 * <s>Camino is not a product of the Mozilla Corporation, so it should not ship under the Corporation EULA nor should about:license imply that official binaries of Camino are released by the Corporation.</s>
 ** <s>EULA and about:license inconsistency are loosely covered by the discussion in {{bug|343220}}</s>
-** <s>When this situation is resolved, we need to clarify the "license block" on cb.o, jp.cb.o, and any other translations of cb.o that may be live by that time.</s>
+** When this situation is resolved, we need to clarify the "license block" on cb.o, jp.cb.o, and any other translations of cb.o that may be live by that time, {{bug|365629}}.
 ===Possible Issues===

@@ Line 50: / Line 50: @@
 ===Possible Issues===
-* See [[#Source Code|above section]] for issue about trademark status of Camino logo
+* See [[#Source Code|above section]] for issue about trademark status of Camino logo; {{bug|370467}}
 * Should the hi-res logo image(s) be publicly available for anyone, or should there be an "ask us" policy (on a future improved "press/media" page)?
 ** Especially if the logo is a Foundation trademark, official or unofficial...

@@ Line 44: / Line 44: @@
 ** We simply '''translate''' the EULA from English, knowing that such a license could be ineffective in certain countries
 ** We find legal advice for the '''localization''' of the EULA
-*: We will do this (based on Mo* EULAs); no bug yet.
+*: We will do this (based on Mo* EULAs); {{bug|363010}}.
 ==Trademarks==

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 * <s>Wrong EULA on the .dmg
 ** EULA is currently the "Mozilla Corporation End-User License Agreement" though Camino is neither a Mozilla Corporation or Mozilla Foundation product (the Foundation does, however, own the trademark).</s> '''FIXED''' in {{bug|353753}}
-* about:license in Camino contains the following misleading and/or incorrect statement:
+* <s>about:license in Camino contains the following misleading and/or incorrect statement:</s>
-*:Official '''binaries''' of this product released by the [http://www.mozilla.com/ Mozilla Corporation]  are made available under [http://www.mozilla.org/foundation/EULA/ the corresponding EULA].
+*:<s>Official '''binaries''' of this product released by the [http://www.mozilla.com/ Mozilla Corporation]  are made available under [http://www.mozilla.org/foundation/EULA/ the corresponding EULA].</s>
-** Note that EULA page/link redirects to the [http://www.mozilla.com/legal/eula/ Mozilla Corporation EULA] page, which, correctly, has no Camino EULA.
+** <s>Note that EULA page/link redirects to the [http://www.mozilla.com/legal/eula/ Mozilla Corporation EULA] page, which, correctly, has no Camino EULA.</s>
-*: The about:license issue is filed as {{bug|353917}}.
+*: <s>The about:license issue is filed as {{bug|353917}}.</s>
-* Camino is not a product of the Mozilla Corporation, so it should not ship under the Corporation EULA nor should about:license imply that official binaries of Camino are released by the Corporation.
+* <s>Camino is not a product of the Mozilla Corporation, so it should not ship under the Corporation EULA nor should about:license imply that official binaries of Camino are released by the Corporation.</s>
-** EULA and about:license inconsistency are loosely covered by the discussion in {{bug|343220}}
+** <s>EULA and about:license inconsistency are loosely covered by the discussion in {{bug|343220}}</s>
-** When this situation is resolved, we need to clarify the "license block" on cb.o, jp.cb.o, and any other translations of cb.o that may be live by that time.
+** <s>When this situation is resolved, we need to clarify the "license block" on cb.o, jp.cb.o, and any other translations of cb.o that may be live by that time.</s>
 ===Possible Issues===

@@ Line 35: / Line 35: @@
 * What license should the nightly builds use?
 ** Verify this in the discussion in {{bug|343220}}; Camino always ships with the "Camino" trademark, so it seems it should always use the EULA
-* about:license is not exposed in Camino UI
+* <s>about:license is not exposed in Camino UI
 ** However, in mozilla.org projects, about:license also fulfills the "Initial Developers" notification required by Section 3.3b of the MPL:
 **:<tt>You must include a prominent statement that the Modification is derived, directly or indirectly, from Original Code provided by the Initial Developer and including the name of the Initial Developer in (a) the Source Code, and (b) in any notice in an Executable version or related documentation in which You describe the origin or ownership of the Covered Code.</tt>
 ** Since we mention copyright and contributors in our About Camino dialog, it seems we should, at the minimum, mention about:license there.
-*** Note that for various reasons (chrome privileges, default browser issues) there are no live links in that window (it's a standard RTF-based Mac OS X About box); will a similar "type about:license for license information" suffice to fulfill this requirement?
+*** Note that for various reasons (chrome privileges, default browser issues) there are no live links in that window (it's a standard RTF-based Mac OS X About box); will a similar "type about:license for license information" suffice to fulfill this requirement?</s>
-** {{bug|353920}} filed on about:license
+** {{bug|353920}} filed on about:license '''FIXED'''
 * The EULA should be localized (it's quite silly that opening the ml dmg the very first thing you get is a English-only window), but we can't rely on the small amount of volunteers we have for translation of legalese. We could have 2 main scenarios:
 ** We simply '''translate''' the EULA from English, knowing that such a license could be ineffective in certain countries
 ** We find legal advice for the '''localization''' of the EULA
 ==Trademarks==