Difference between revisions of "Development:Planning:Internal URIs"
(→about:: add "Set as home page") |
|||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
==External (non-Camino-handled) protocols== | ==External (non-Camino-handled) protocols== | ||
| − | They can currently be bookmarked. If this is OK, then we should probably ''not'' be adding them to the top 10 (see also {{bug 302601}}) or history, and we may not want to keep a visit count for them. Are there other situations we should worry about with external protocols? | + | They can currently be bookmarked. If this is OK, then we should probably ''not'' be adding them to the top 10 (see also {{bug|302601}}) or history, and we may not want to keep a visit count for them. Are there other situations we should worry about with external protocols? |
==Other situations== | ==Other situations== | ||
Revision as of 17:05, 17 June 2006
We need to evaluate/audit/decide/whatever how special-case URIs (e.g., about:, view-source:, etc.) should be handled by various features (i.e., View Source, Save As, etc.).
Contents
about:
View Source
View Source should be disabled for all about: URIs.
Save As
Save As should be disabled for all about: URIs.
Email Page Location
Email Page Location should be disabled for all about: URIs.
Fill Form
Fill Form should be disabled for all about: URIs.
Get Info
Get Info should probably be disabled for all about: URIs.
Set as home page
about:blank and about:bookmarks are the only two about: URIs that make sense as a home page. Should we do something about this?
view-source:
View Source
View Source should be disabled when viewing source of a page.
Save As
Save As should be enabled when viewing the source of a page.
Email Page Location
Email Page Location should be disabled when viewing the source of a page.
Fill Form
Fill Form should be disabled when viewing the source of a page.
Get Info
Get Info should probably be disabled when viewing the source of a page.
Set as home page
It seems a little silly to allow a view-source: page to be set as the home page.
External (non-Camino-handled) protocols
They can currently be bookmarked. If this is OK, then we should probably not be adding them to the top 10 (see also Bug 302601) or history, and we may not want to keep a visit count for them. Are there other situations we should worry about with external protocols?
Other situations
- Should we be allowing users to bookmark view-source: or about: URIs?
- If so, should we increment visit counts for them?
- If so, should they be on the top 10 list? See also Template:bug 302601.
