Difference between revisions of "Development:Planning:Internal URIs"
(expand) |
(→about:: add "Set as home page") |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Get Info should probably be disabled for all about: URIs. | Get Info should probably be disabled for all about: URIs. | ||
+ | ===Set as home page=== | ||
+ | about:blank and about:bookmarks are the only two about: URIs that make sense as a home page. Should we do something about this? | ||
==view-source:== | ==view-source:== |
Revision as of 17:03, 17 June 2006
We need to evaluate/audit/decide/whatever how special-case URIs (e.g., about:, view-source:, etc.) should be handled by various features (i.e., View Source, Save As, etc.).
Contents
about:
View Source
View Source should be disabled for all about: URIs.
Save As
Save As should be disabled for all about: URIs.
Email Page Location
Email Page Location should be disabled for all about: URIs.
Fill Form
Fill Form should be disabled for all about: URIs.
Get Info
Get Info should probably be disabled for all about: URIs.
Set as home page
about:blank and about:bookmarks are the only two about: URIs that make sense as a home page. Should we do something about this?
view-source:
View Source
View Source should be disabled when viewing source of a page.
Save As
Save As should be enabled when viewing the source of a page.
Email Page Location
Email Page Location should be disabled when viewing the source of a page.
Fill Form
Fill Form should be disabled when viewing the source of a page.
Get Info
Get Info should probably be disabled when viewing the source of a page.
Set as home page
It seems a little silly to allow a view-source: page to be set as the home page.
External (non-Camino-handled) protocols
They can currently be bookmarked. If this is OK, then we should probably not be adding them to the top 10 (see also Template:bug 302601) or history, and we may not want to keep a visit count for them. Are there other situations we should worry about with external protocols?
Other situations
- Should we be allowing users to bookmark view-source: or about: URIs?
- If so, should we increment visit counts for them?
- If so, should they be on the top 10 list? See also Template:bug 302601.