Status Meetings:2010-09-22:Log

Log from #camino-mtg starting 2010-09-22 15:52:37 -0400

Link to a time in the log by using a URL like http://wiki.caminobrowser.org/Status_Meetings:2010-09-22:Log#12:00

15:52		» sauron joined the chat room.
15:52		» ardissone was promoted to operator by ChanServ.
15:52		» sauron was promoted to operator by ChanServ.
15:52		» ardissone changed the topic to "http://wiki.caminobrowser.org/Status_Meetings:2010-09-22:Agenda".
15:52		» cl was promoted to operator by ardissone.
16:00		» smorgan joined the chat room.
16:00		» smorgan was promoted to operator by ardissone.
16:03		» pinkerton joined the chat room.
16:04		» pinkerton was promoted to operator by ardissone.
16:04	ardissone:	brb
16:04	ardissone:	pinkerton: can you give mozilla.org@cpeterso.com canconfirm/editbugs?
16:04	ardissone:	is tired of assigning his bugs to him ;)
16:08	ss:	You should just get permissions to do that.
16:09	ardissone:	?
16:09	ardissone:	http://wiki.caminobrowser.org/Status_Meetings:2010-09-22:Agenda
16:10	ardissone:	we had a nice decline in crashes
16:10	ardissone:	not sure if it was real or was because of the Socorro mess
16:11	ardissone:	(or everyone leaving because of #newtwitter being horribly broken in 2.0 :P )
16:11	ardissone:	KBL is still our most significant crash
16:12	ardissone:	though Flash was up in % (both parts, despite what it says)
16:12	ardissone:	anything else on 2.0.4?
16:13	ardissone:	ok
16:14	ardissone:	on 1.6.x, total usage numbers are starting to stabilize from back-to-school, and the fake update doesn't seem to be having much effect right now
16:15	ardissone:	:(
16:15	ardissone:	on to 2.0.5
16:15	ardissone:	smorgan: any progress on ideas for KBL?
16:16	smorgan:	Not yet, soryy
16:16	ardissone:	ok
16:16	ardissone:	we're in pretty good shape otherwise
16:17	ardissone:	there are some forthcoming security fixes that we will absolutely want in 2.0.5, so we need to let them land on 1.9.x before we build
16:18	ardissone:	because I can't even minibranch them without exposing 1.9.x users
16:18	ardissone:	(freeze for 1.9.x is supposed to be a week from yesterday)
16:19	ardissone:	anything else on 2.0.5?
16:20		» Jan left the chat room.
16:20	ardissone:	on to 2.1
16:21	ardissone:	main developments here are that smorgan's been spinning off pieces of the perf bug as he goes along, and the WIPs are generally producing better results
16:22	ardissone:	i believe cl was seeing some startup issues, but i'm not clear on that
16:23	smorgan:	Yeah, startup sucks. part of it is sychronous
16:23	ardissone:	is it potentially improvable?
16:24	smorgan:	Not sure yet; doing sub-range queries might help. I don't know enough about the deep internals of the history system to know for sure
16:24	ardissone:	heh
16:24	ardissone:	ok
16:25	ardissone:	i did/landed a bunch of build-related cleanup
16:25	ardissone:	and we're getting about 1.5 bugs/wk from cpeterso
16:26	ardissone:	(but for the most part, not 2.1 targeted/? bugs from either of us)
16:27	ardissone:	overall, we're at about the same place wrt Alpha 1: whenever the perf fixes are deployable (with the rest of gestures riding along if murph has a patch)
16:28	ardissone:	on the plus side, we did RESOLVED FIXED 10 bugs for the second inter-meeting-period in a row :)
16:29	pinkerton:	:)
16:29	ardissone:	anything else on 2.1?
16:31	ardissone:	anyone have anything else on anything else today?
16:33	ardissone:	ok then
16:33	ardissone:	everyone have a good week, and please keep working on those 2.1a1/2.0.5 bugs/reviews :)