Status Meetings:2008-06-25:Log
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
[12:08pm] You were promoted to operator by chanserv. [12:09pm] You changed the topic to "http://wiki.caminobrowser.org/Status_Meetings:2008-06-25:Agenda". [12:09pm] cl|out was promoted to operator by you. [12:09pm] murph was promoted to operator by you. [12:09pm] peeja was promoted to operator by you. [12:09pm] smorgan joined the chat room. [12:09pm] mento joined the chat room. [12:09pm] mento was promoted to operator by chanserv. [12:09pm] smorgan was promoted to operator by you. [12:10pm] ardissone: any pink today? [12:10pm] smorgan: Not sure, but I would guess not [12:10pm] ardissone: k [12:11pm] ardissone: everyone please open your camino 1.6.1 or newer to http://wiki.caminobrowser.org/Status_Meetings:2008-06-25:Agenda [12:12pm] ardissone: i have some more 1.6.1 talkback analysis there [12:12pm] ardissone: the number of places we're seeing random bits of Camino code fingered is a bit scary [12:12pm] ardissone: also the crashes on startup [12:13pm] ardissone: a few of the at-startup ones talkback has fingered [MainController checkForProblemAddOns] [12:14pm] ardissone: i filed the realplayer crash from last week, and found that it's across the board, at least on PPC [12:14pm] ardissone: i'll try to look at it again on 10.3.9, but if we have other PPCs out there, please try to crash [12:14pm] ardissone: erm [12:14pm] ardissone: where did that bug go? [12:15pm] ardissone: anyway [12:16pm] ardissone: if you get a chance, please have a look at some of the talback reports and see if those stacks seem useful [12:16pm] ardissone: 1.6.2 [12:16pm] ardissone: mento's going to spin today [12:16pm] mento: maybe [12:16pm] mento: talkback [12:16pm] mento: y'know [12:16pm] ardissone: yeah, getting there [12:16pm] ardissone: ss: did you put the talkback package on there yet? [12:16pm] ardissone: i poked him last night [12:17pm] ardissone: l10n just got notes yesterday around their bedtimes [12:17pm] ardissone: so who knows if they'll be ready by week-end [12:18pm] ardissone: we'll see [12:18pm] ardissone: anyone have anything else on 1.6.2 or 1.6.x? [12:20pm] ardissone: ok [12:20pm] ardissone: 2.0a1 [12:20pm] ardissone: we need a target date [12:20pm] smorgan: Sorry, I've been really busy [12:21pm] ardissone: stupid day jobs [12:21pm] smorgan: But I'll try to get at least the basic exception UI in by the end of the week [12:21pm] ardissone: k [12:21pm] smorgan: er, week-end [12:22pm] ardissone: do we know if andy's pushed the sparkle fixes yet? [12:22pm] smorgan: I don't think he had last time I checked, but maybe I just can't read the new site [12:22pm] smorgan: I'll check [12:22pm] ardissone: k [12:22pm] ardissone: since that was our other pseudo-blocker [12:23pm] smorgan: We could always pull the last sparkle and apply my changes if necessary [12:24pm] smorgan: But I'd rather not [12:24pm] ardissone: mmm [12:24pm] ardissone: yeah [12:25pm] ardissone: murph posted a new patch last week, and it seems to work nicely; i left a few comments and bugs... [12:26pm] murph: along that note, is it best I attempt to tackle the follow-ups right now or wait for the main blocker to get checked in? [12:26pm] murph: I've been working on the browser window key view loop in the meantime, and I think I have that nailed right now [12:26pm] ardissone: [12:27pm] ardissone: i suppose it depends on how much they depend on code that is likely to be changed in review? [12:27pm] ardissone: also note that we'll have to fight 1.9.0.x on that bug [12:27pm] ardissone: because of the little toolkit hunk [12:28pm] ardissone: i'm not sure when 1.9.0.1 nominations will close [12:28pm] ardissone: and 1.9.0.2 will open [12:28pm] ardissone: not to add more pressure on smorgan [12:29pm] ardissone: just that it will probably have to sit and wait to land for a while once it has r and sr [12:29pm] ardissone: [12:29pm] kreeger joined the chat room. [12:29pm] kreeger was promoted to operator by you. [12:29pm] ardissone: anything that's relatively self-contained, like I think the site icon is, you can probably work on now [12:30pm] ardissone: without too much worry [12:30pm] smorgan: The makefile piece? [12:30pm] ardissone: yeah [12:30pm] smorgan: That could land without any of the rest, right? [12:30pm] ardissone: actually, can we safely spliut that out? [12:31pm] murph: ok, that sounds good, and I should actually be able to tackle most, including the information panel view, too without too much worry about the original patch [12:31pm] ardissone: have mento give it a quick r [12:31pm] ardissone: since it's just build-config [12:31pm] ardissone: murph: just landing the makefile piece won't cause any problems, right? [12:31pm] ardissone: we'll just build stuff that's not yet used/packed? [12:32pm] murph: nope, it will just cause the url-clasifier to be built, and it'll just sit unused until the patch is ready [12:32pm] ardissone: ok, good [12:32pm] ardissone: can you spin that hunk separately, even as a separate bug to appease branch drivers [12:33pm] murph: it won't even generate a component, just a static library that won't be placed anywhere [12:33pm] murph: yea, sure. [12:33pm] ardissone: and ask mento to r it real quick [12:33pm] ardissone: (ask in channel; mento says we need to inform him in such ways if we need him for something) [12:34pm] murph: ok. [12:34pm] ardissone: then sam or i can handle the dog-and-pony show [12:34pm] murph: hehe, ok [12:35pm] ardissone: someone else will need to do the checkin if approval doesn't come next few days, though [12:35pm] ardissone: no jeff again [12:35pm] murph left the chat room. (Connection reset by peer) [12:35pm] murph_ joined the chat room. [12:36pm] ardissone: anyone else have anything on 2.0/2.0a1? [12:36pm] murph_ was promoted to operator by you. [12:36pm] ardissone: [12:35pm] ardissone: someone else will need to do the checkin if approval doesn't come next few days, though [12:37pm] ardissone: tinderboxen: sam got us branch builds over the week-end [12:37pm] ardissone: no talkback yet [12:37pm] ardissone: so we can spin 1.6.2 on a 1.24 GHz G4 mini [12:38pm] ardissone: the Xserve is still in limbo [12:38pm] ardissone: it's supposedly alive, but still waiting on IT to finish setup properly [12:39pm] ardissone: so it might be back sometime [12:39pm] ardissone: the r queue is getting to be a bit of a problem [12:40pm] ardissone: in particular, cl has run out of reviewers who don't have one of his patches in their queues [12:40pm] ardissone: and is starting to have lots of patch overlap given the bugs he feels he can fix [12:41pm] ardissone: so we need to make an effort on the backlog in the r queue ;) [12:41pm] ardissone: also [12:42pm] ardissone: we need someone (or someones) to volunteer to do the meeting agendas, lead the meetings, and keep/post meeting logs in july [12:42pm] ardissone: because i will be completely offline [12:44pm] smorgan: can't commit to much of anything in July [12:47pm] ardissone: maybe we can make sam do it again :P [12:47pm] ardissone: or pry froodian away from his life-sucking job :P [12:48pm] ardissone: anything have anyone else this week? [12:51pm] ardissone: OK [12:52pm] ardissone: everyone have a good week, and keep an eye on those queues ;)