Difference between revisions of "Status Meetings:2006-10-11:Agenda"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→General Plans: more updates) |
(→Camino 1.1: deduct the license header fix :() |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
** Hold again or go? | ** Hold again or go? | ||
*** kqueue not ready yet; this weekend/by Tues hopefully | *** kqueue not ready yet; this weekend/by Tues hopefully | ||
| − | *** No real movement on the pop-up blocker front | + | *** No real movement on the pop-up blocker front (there are some patches and investigations) |
*** Menu cleanup has r+; waiting on second r and sr | *** Menu cleanup has r+; waiting on second r and sr | ||
| − | *** planet.m.o says Fx2 RC 3 is Tue Oct 17 and Fx2 release is Tue Oct 24 | + | *** planet.m.o says Fx2 RC 3 is next Tue (Oct 17) and Fx2 release is 2 weeks: Tue Oct 24 |
* What about putting l10ns into Camino source repository? (by [[User:Marcello|Marcello]]) | * What about putting l10ns into Camino source repository? (by [[User:Marcello|Marcello]]) | ||
** I'd like to spend most of my efforts on the community side of Caminol10n, trying to make it better and more productive. Since I already maintain (in a very clumsy way) a cvs repository of l10n packages and text files, why not put them among Camino's source, so that the ML package might be built directly from that place? | ** I'd like to spend most of my efforts on the community side of Caminol10n, trying to make it better and more productive. Since I already maintain (in a very clumsy way) a cvs repository of l10n packages and text files, why not put them among Camino's source, so that the ML package might be built directly from that place? | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
* l10n of license.r on dmg? Is that feasible tech-wise? | * l10n of license.r on dmg? Is that feasible tech-wise? | ||
* Tab scrolling landed on the trunk (congrats delliott!); follow-up bugs being filed | * Tab scrolling landed on the trunk (congrats delliott!); follow-up bugs being filed | ||
| + | * Tinderboxen upgrades are on build's radar (coop) | ||
* Weekly Bugs and Queues update | * Weekly Bugs and Queues update | ||
** Fixed a few more bugs, mostly non-1.1 bugs though | ** Fixed a few more bugs, mostly non-1.1 bugs though | ||
| Line 27: | Line 28: | ||
==Specific bugs that need action== | ==Specific bugs that need action== | ||
| + | * {{bug|350331}} - Pages sometimes fail to display when loaded; resizing the window fixes display | ||
| + | ** ''We have a regression range, but need more investigation'' | ||
| + | * {{bug|356242}} - Make CHBrowserListener an informal protocol | ||
| + | ** ''Any reason not to do this (see bug for rationale)?'' | ||
| + | * {{bug|306396}} - Don't show wyciwyg URLs in location bar | ||
| + | ** ''Is the home-rolled method OK, or do we need to pull in additional Gecko components to use the same method Fx does?'' | ||
| + | * {{bug|350732}} - Going back with popup bar on screen truncates scroll view | ||
| + | ** ''Any ideas why this is not working (or why some people can repro and others cannot)?'' | ||
| + | * {{bug|355080}} - prettify about:config warning in line with the error pages | ||
| + | ** ''Which proposal looks better/most in line with error pages? [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=241287&action=view], [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=241288&action=view]'' | ||
==Queries== | ==Queries== | ||
| Line 44: | Line 55: | ||
*: The above list needs to be at least spot-audited for potential 1.1 issues | *: The above list needs to be at least spot-audited for potential 1.1 issues | ||
| − | * [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&product=Camino&chfieldfrom=2006-10-04&chfieldto=2006-10-11&chfield=resolution&chfieldvalue=FIXED&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time Bugs fixed since last meeting] (''' | + | * [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&product=Camino&chfieldfrom=2006-10-04&chfieldto=2006-10-11&chfield=resolution&chfieldvalue=FIXED&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time Bugs fixed since last meeting] ('''9''') {{greyText|[+1 since last week]}} (4 bugs were 1.1-targeted; of those, 1 was a 1.1a1 nominee)<!-- --> |
==Queues== | ==Queues== | ||
Latest revision as of 23:02, 10 October 2006
Wed 11 Oct 9am PDT (16:00 GMT/UTC) in #camino-mtg
Contents
General Plans
- Camino 1.1 Alpha 1
- Hold again or go?
- kqueue not ready yet; this weekend/by Tues hopefully
- No real movement on the pop-up blocker front (there are some patches and investigations)
- Menu cleanup has r+; waiting on second r and sr
- planet.m.o says Fx2 RC 3 is next Tue (Oct 17) and Fx2 release is 2 weeks: Tue Oct 24
- Hold again or go?
- What about putting l10ns into Camino source repository? (by Marcello)
- I'd like to spend most of my efforts on the community side of Caminol10n, trying to make it better and more productive. Since I already maintain (in a very clumsy way) a cvs repository of l10n packages and text files, why not put them among Camino's source, so that the ML package might be built directly from that place?
- Pros:
- I shouldn't work on building and distributing, and I would not be a bottleneck as sometimes happened in the past
- Unified Camino build more in line with Mac OS X
- Cons:
- The build system would need be changed
- Moving the bottleneck to coordinating cvs checkins
- Out-of-date translations:
- Stale files on development branches (e.g., an out-of-date BrowserWindow.nib will hork that language) [could be worked around by keeping nightlies En-only]
- Non-updated l10ns still in cvs across branch changes or emergency new strings on a stable branch (e.g., Pirate 1.0.x never gets updated for 1.x, or in the event string changes are needed for 1.0.x+1)
- additional pros/cons in italics by sardisson, who'd really like to see a unified Camino build nonetheless
- l10n of license.r on dmg? Is that feasible tech-wise?
- Tab scrolling landed on the trunk (congrats delliott!); follow-up bugs being filed
- Tinderboxen upgrades are on build's radar (coop)
- Weekly Bugs and Queues update
- Fixed a few more bugs, mostly non-1.1 bugs though
- r queue fairly large with midterms and hwaara and froodian away part of the period
Specific bugs that need action
- Bug 350331 - Pages sometimes fail to display when loaded; resizing the window fixes display
- We have a regression range, but need more investigation
- Bug 356242 - Make CHBrowserListener an informal protocol
- Any reason not to do this (see bug for rationale)?
- Bug 306396 - Don't show wyciwyg URLs in location bar
- Is the home-rolled method OK, or do we need to pull in additional Gecko components to use the same method Fx does?
- Bug 350732 - Going back with popup bar on screen truncates scroll view
- Any ideas why this is not working (or why some people can repro and others cannot)?
- Bug 355080 - prettify about:config warning in line with the error pages
Queries
Camino 1.1a1
- Blocking ? (7) [-2 net since last week]
- Blocking + (0) [unchanged]
- Blocking - (0) [unchanged]
Camino 1.1
- Bugs targeted at 1.1 (114) [-2 net since last week]
- Blocking ? (11) [unchanged]
- Blocking + (3) [unchanged]
- Blocking - (0) [unchanged]
- Bugs without target (256) [+12 since last week]
- The above list needs to be at least spot-audited for potential 1.1 issues
- Bugs fixed since last meeting (9) [+1 since last week] (4 bugs were 1.1-targeted; of those, 1 was a 1.1a1 nominee)
Queues
- Review (13) [+7 net since last week]
- Superreview (5) [+2 net since last week]
