Difference between revisions of "QA:Triage Policies and Procedures"

From Camino Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Confirming Bugs: some other things)
(→‎Confirming Bugs: some more things)
Line 18: Line 18:
 
* If the bug has a clean report and is clearly a real bug in the Camino application UI, then by all means confirm the bug.  Otherwise, proceed more cautiously, seek additional opinions, etc., before confirming a bug.
 
* If the bug has a clean report and is clearly a real bug in the Camino application UI, then by all means confirm the bug.  Otherwise, proceed more cautiously, seek additional opinions, etc., before confirming a bug.
  
* When to set priority and target milestone; fixing other fields (Camino component, QA, branch)...
+
* When you confirm a Camino bug, you should also do the following:
 
+
** When to set priority and target milestone
* Tagging bugs that only appear in one or more major Mac OS X versions...
+
** Fix other fields (Camino component and QA contact, branch, mis-filed severity)...
 +
** CCing developers if appropriate; see their areas of expertise in [[Development:Reviewing#Reviewers_and_Owners|Development:Reviewing]]
 +
** Tagging bugs that only appear in one or more major Mac OS X versions...
 +
** Adding keywords
 +
** Adding to [meta] trackers, blocks/depends management
  
 
== Moving Bugs to Other Products and Components ==
 
== Moving Bugs to Other Products and Components ==

Revision as of 15:27, 1 May 2006

Common QA Troubleshooting Tips

Searching for Duplicate Bugs

Confirming Bugs

  • Don't confirm RFEs (bugs with severity set to enhancement, or enhancement requests misfiled with some other sort of bug severity, which are very common, particularly if another browser provides such a feature) until there has been discussion among the triage team and, in some cases, with the project lead(s). This helps combat feature creep and keeps Camino from having a kitchen sink.
  • Don't confirm any bug that looks like it has the potential of being a Core bug (anything that has to do with the content area, or with certain app features whose underlying implementation is tightly linked with the Core, e.g. the pop-up blocker, session or global history); see Moving Bugs to Other Products and Components below for more about moving bugs to Core components.
  • Don't confirm bugs that look like they might be resolved DUPLICATE, INVALID, or WONTFIX. Perform a search of old Camino bugs with these resolutions before confirming bugs (especially the latter two; a request or bug may have been WONTFIXed before you began QA work, but that doesn't mean the project lead(s) have changed their opinion. See QA:Bugzilla:Searching For Dupes for more on search for duplicates, including duplicates of WONTFIXed and INVALID bugs.
  • If the bug has a clean report and is clearly a real bug in the Camino application UI, then by all means confirm the bug. Otherwise, proceed more cautiously, seek additional opinions, etc., before confirming a bug.
  • When you confirm a Camino bug, you should also do the following:
    • When to set priority and target milestone
    • Fix other fields (Camino component and QA contact, branch, mis-filed severity)...
    • CCing developers if appropriate; see their areas of expertise in Development:Reviewing
    • Tagging bugs that only appear in one or more major Mac OS X versions...
    • Adding keywords
    • Adding to [meta] trackers, blocks/depends management

Moving Bugs to Other Products and Components

Regression Windows

  • Old nightlies on ftp.m.o
  • Older nightlies on archive.m.o

“CLOSEME”

  • Dealing with old UNCOs

General Mozilla Policies