Difference between revisions of "Status Meetings:2006-08-14:Agenda"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→General Plans: Reviewing) |
(→Specific bugs that need action: bookmark loss) |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
** Carbon breaks 3rd-party mice | ** Carbon breaks 3rd-party mice | ||
** Alternates has smfr worried about perf | ** Alternates has smfr worried about perf | ||
| + | * Investigation of bookmark loss (and specifically the failure of the backup mechanism) - {{bug|337750}} | ||
Revision as of 21:47, 13 August 2006
General Plans
- Timeframe and scope for 1.1
- Semi-related documents
- Triage update
- Documentation/website/wiki update
- Moving development to the wiki
- Build docs update in progress Development:Building:Intel
- New contributor overview Development:Contributor_Overview
- Issues
- Reviewing
- Wait times are very long (over a month in many cases) even with only seeking single r
- Too few reviewers
- Queue gets backed up in one place, then cleared and backed up elsewhere
- What's realistic/reasonable to expect/ask?
- Reviewing
Specific bugs that need action
- Reply to bz in the scrollbars bugs - Bug 160627 (and Bug 324907, the regression)
- Bug 348171 - slow deleting - get it on someone's radar (brettw or Gecko folks)
- Bug 328173 - User:Froodian:MenuCleanup
- Bug 333765 - use Carbon call or alternates or ?
- Decision needed
- Carbon breaks 3rd-party mice
- Alternates has smfr worried about perf
- Investigation of bookmark loss (and specifically the failure of the backup mechanism) - Bug 337750
